Volume 7, Number 4 (2-2017)                   ejgcst 2017, 7(4): 75-85 | Back to browse issues page

DOI: 10.18869/acadpub.ejgcst.7.4.75

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rasouli-Sadaghiani M, Ejlali S. Evaluating the effects of Eisenia foetida inoculation and different organic wastes application on some soil biological quality indicators under greenhouse conditions. ejgcst. 2017; 7 (4) :75-85
URL: http://ejgcst.iut.ac.ir/article-1-1262-en.html

Dept. of Soil Sci., College of Agric., Urmia Univ., Urmia, Iran.
Abstract:   (641 Views)

Earthworms are considered as one of the soil quality and health indicators. In order to evaluate the effects of earthworms activity on some soil biological quality indicators, an experiment was carried out in greenhouse conditions with different organic materials including trees’ pruning waste compost (PWC), wheat straw (WS), herbal extracts waste (HEW), trees’ pruning waste (PW) in a pot experiment, with growing corn plants, for evaluating soil rhizosphere properties. At the end of growing period, some soil biological properties including basal respiration (BR), substrate-induced respiration (SIR), microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and microbial population were measured in rhizosphere and non-rhizospheric soils. Results showed that WS treatment had the most impact on basal respiration and substrate induced respiration content (2 and 2.4 fold) compared to control treatment (without organic matter), respectively. Also, microbial biomass carbon in PWC treatment (in rhizosphere soil) increased 59.2% as compared to non-rhizosphere soil. Microbial population in PWC, HEW, PW and WS treatments was 1.5, 2.6, 2.7 and 1.9 times more than control, respectively. Therefore, application of different organic matter in the presence of earthworms led to improve soil biological properties compared to when no earthworms were added.

Full-Text [PDF 109 kb]   (177 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Applicable | Subject: Ornamental and Medicinal Crop Production
Received: 2017/02/14 | Accepted: 2017/02/14 | Published: 2017/02/14

Add your comments about this article : Your username or email:
Write the security code in the box

Send email to the article author